Well of Matter...can't...exist

It seems that since the last time Esup proposed this ridiculous theory to me, he has changed some of its inner workings. I feel that to do my duty in the name of science I must break down his post, and his presentation to show you not only why the theory, but also Esup himself is flawed. He starts of with the phrase

"So, down to business enlightening those of you who have not seen the enlight..."

which is just absurd. Yes, one could point out in some situations that this a slightly clever pun, but it has no place in the strict scientific community. He later talks about the Well of Matter's "impact" on the world and the universe. This just, well is completely false. It's like saying the many conspiracy theories at large today add something of value to the world.
I have trouble even reading the next two paragraphs without cringing as science is dragged kicking and screaming into the underworld, mercilessly beaten by a cold-faced man in a black trench coat....er sorry, i try to restrain the poet within, but sometimes he bursts out like....oh no there i go again. Anyway as i was saying, i have problems with almost every single line following the first paragraph. These problems run deep. "Programming of the universe"?..."living"?...."sentient"?! The list goes on. A few fundamental flaws that I will stoop to notice are the impossibility of a rotating universe, and the transgression of the conservation of energy.
First off, the impossibility of a rotating universe. Too put it simply a rotating universe would cause time and therefore space to exist in a state and shape inconsistent with our current observations, and actually proven inhabitable by sentient beings, such as ourselves. According to some solutions of Einstein's field equations for gravity, large rotating bodies swirl space, and therefore time, around like a smoothie in a blender. Obviously if time gets swirled, we wouldn't be able to exist for the cause and effect process that drives evolution would not work, and if the universe rotated it would swirl all time everywhere.
My second big contention with the current iteration of Esup's error is his violation of the conservation of energy. Again I quote Einstein, using his most widely know equation, E=MC^2. Simply stated this says that a given amount of energy can be converted to a specific amount of matter and vice-versa. This also implies that something can't come from nothing, which seems to be the most important feature of the Well of Matter.
I could rail on more about the inconsistansies of this so called "theory," but it would mean reading it more, which has already given me a severe headache.

~~JLay

---

All you readers out there, please spread this blog among your friends, people must know the truth...


More about E=MC^2